4.5 Article

Unintended environmental consequences of place-based economic policies

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 291-315

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12313

Keywords

difference-in-difference-in-differences; environmental effect; regional economic development policy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the environmental consequences of two regional economic development policies in the Upper Pearl River regions of Guangdong Province, China. The research reveals that these policies have led to higher growth rates in industries with high water pollution compared to industries with less water pollution. The second policy, which includes environmental regulations, has been effective in restricting the entry of new firms in high-pollution industries, but has failed to remove existing high-pollution firms from the region.
We examine the environmental consequences of two regional economic development (RED) policies that aimed to develop the economy of the relatively underdeveloped upper Pearl River (UPR) regions in Guangdong Province, China. Applying the triple-difference analysis to annual county-industry-level data, we find that the two RED policies caused higher growth in industries with high water pollution than in industries with less water pollution in the UPR regions. The second RED policy with environmental regulations was effective in restraining the new entry of firms in high-pollution industries into the UPR regions but failed to drive existing high-pollution firms out of the UPR regions. Firms' location decisions were driven by the more favorable tax regimes and less stringent pollution regulations in the UPR regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available