4.7 Review

Changes in cognitive functioning after COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 1047-1066

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12644

Keywords

attention; cognition; cognitive dysfunction; COVID-19; executive functions; neuropsychological test; SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the cognitive effects of COVID-19 in adults without prior cognitive impairment. The results showed that post-COVID-19 patients experienced impairments in executive functions, attention, and memory. A meta-analysis comparing recovered COVID-19 patients and healthy controls demonstrated lower general cognition in the post-infection period up to 7 months.
Introduction We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults with no prior history of cognitive impairment. Methods Searches in Medline/Web of Science/Embase from January 1, 2020, to December 13, 2021, were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A meta-analysis of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score comparing recovered COVID-19 and healthy controls was performed. Results Oof 6202 articles, 27 studies with 2049 individuals were included (mean age = 56.05 years, evaluation time ranged from the acute phase to 7 months post-infection). Impairment in executive functions, attention, and memory were found in post-COVID-19 patients. The meta-analysis was performed with a subgroup of 290 individuals and showed a difference in MoCA score between post-COVID-19 patients versus controls (mean difference = -0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.59, -0.29; P = .0049). Discussion Patients recovered from COVID-19 have lower general cognition compared to healthy controls up to 7 months post-infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available