4.7 Article

Assessment of the role of the Edinburgh dysphagia score in referral triage in a national service evaluation of the urgent suspected upper gastrointestinal cancer pathway

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 55, Issue 9, Pages 1160-1168

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.16811

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the BSG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Edinburgh Dysphagia Score (EDS) is recommended by the British Society of Gastroenterology for risk-stratifying dysphagia referrals during the endoscopy COVID recovery phase. This study externally validated the diagnostic accuracy of EDS and developed a modified Cancer Dysphagia Score (CDS) with even higher accuracy. The EDS or CDS should be incorporated into the urgent suspected upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer pathway.
Background The British Society of Gastroenterology has recommended the Edinburgh Dysphagia Score (EDS) to risk-stratify dysphagia referrals during the endoscopy COVID recovery phase. Aims External validation of the diagnostic accuracy of EDS and exploration of potential changes to improve its diagnostic performance. Methods A prospective multicentre study of consecutive patients referred with dysphagia on an urgent suspected upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer pathway between May 2020 and February 2021. The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of EDS were calculated. Variables associated with UGI cancer were identified by forward stepwise logistic regression and a modified Cancer Dysphagia Score (CDS) developed. Results 1301 patients were included from 19 endoscopy providers; 43% male; median age 62 (IQR 51-73) years. 91 (7%) UGI cancers were diagnosed, including 80 oesophageal, 10 gastric and one duodenal cancer. An EDS >= 3.5 had a sensitivity of 96.7 (95% CI 90.7-99.3)% and an NPV of 99.3 (97.8-99.8)%. Age, male sex, progressive dysphagia and unintentional weight loss >3 kg were positively associated and acid reflux and localisation to the neck were negatively associated with UGI cancer. Dysphagia duration <6 months utilised in EDS was replaced with progressive dysphagia in CDS. CDS >= 5.5 had a sensitivity of 97.8 (92.3-99.7)% and NPV of 99.5 (98.1-99.9)%. Area under receiver operating curve was 0.83 for CDS, compared to 0.81 for EDS. Conclusions In a national cohort, the EDS has high sensitivity and NPV as a triage tool for UGI cancer. The CDS offers even higher diagnostic accuracy. The EDS or CDS should be incorporated into the urgent suspected UGI cancer pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available