4.7 Article

Spatial patterns of county-level arable land productive-capacity and its coordination with land-use intensity in mainland China

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 326, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107757

Keywords

Land-use change; Arable land productive-capacity; Arable land-use intensity; Sustainability; GIS; Land-computing

Funding

  1. second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) [2019QZKK0608]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA23100303]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42171250, 41801300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated arable land ecosystem services capacity and arable land-use intensity, highlighting a lack of coordination between evaluation studies leading to challenges in developing management policies. Results showed that land-use change decreased arable land productive-capacity in a significant number of Chinese counties, particularly in central and southern regions and major grain-producing provinces, indicating the need for better coordination. The study provides insights into the interrelations between natural conditions and arable land-use patterns, emphasizing the importance of addressing challenges for exploring sustainable arable land use paths.
Evaluation of arable land ecosystem services capacity and arable land-use intensity (ALUI) is important for recognising key regional factors that impact arable land attributes changes, which is crucial for planning sustainable patterns of arable land use. The chronic lack of coordination between these two types of evaluation studies has made it hard to provide enough information for developing arable land-use management and control policies. Here, we generated a 1-km-grid map of arable land potential yield and county-level arable land productive-capacity. The impact of land-use and land-cover change on county-level total arable land productive-capacity during 1990-2010 had been estimated. Then we determined the aggregation-distribution characteristics of four indexes (i.e. average arable land potential yield, average ALUI, total arable land area and arable land productive-capacity reserves) at the county-level by the k-means algorithm to assess the regional coordination between arable land productive-capacity protection and arable land use. The results show that during 1990-2010, land-use change led to arable land productive-capacity decreases in 2007 of China's 2733 counties (nearly 73.5% of the total counties' count). Most of these counties are in central and southern China, and their corresponding arable land productive-capacity decrement rates are generally < 6.15%. Counties with decrement rates > 6.15% are mainly in the Yangtze and Pearl River delta regions. The geographical detector shows that county-level arable land-area change is a primary factor that drives county-level arable land productive-capacity increase. Its determinant power can be quantified as 74.154%. In contrast, its determinant power to county-level arable land productive-capacity decrease is only 38.542%, which demonstrates that occupy high-capacity arable land and supplement low-capacity arable land have a greater role in causing reduction of county arable land productive-capacity. Total arable land productive-capacity and use intensity show only slight determinant power to county-level arable land productive-capacity decrease. It indicates that insufficient attention has been paid to the protection of arable land productive-capacity and the farmers' willingness in the implementation of China requisition-compensation balance policy. The aggregation-distribution characteristics show that arable land productive-capacity protection is in coordination with arable land use for most of the provinces in China. Arable land with high or medium potential yield tends to be used at high or medium intensity. A lack of coordination is most evident in the insufficient ALUI, particularly in seven of the thirteen major grain-producing provinces. Other evidence of weak coordination is in the low potential yield versus high farming conditions and willingness, where unsuited planting modes should be prevented. Lastly, challenges for exploring sustainable arable land use path have been discussed. This study is greatly instructive for recognising interrelations between natural conditions and arable land-use patterns and for exploring shortcomings that impede regionally sustainable arable land use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available