4.7 Article

Woodchips or potato chips? How enhancing soil carbon and reducing chemical inputs influence the allocation of cropland

Journal

AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103372

Keywords

Short rotation coppice; Robust optimization; Multifunctional agriculture; Goal programming; Downside risk

Funding

  1. Bavarian Ministry of Science and the Arts in the context of the Bavarian Climate Research Network (bayklif)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the potential of producing woody biomass through short rotation coppices (SRC) to help farmers reconcile economic profit maximization with ecological concerns. The results show that SRC has a positive impact on achieving economic objectives and can help reduce trade-offs between economic and ecological goals.
Context: Farmers are facing increasing pressure to practice multifunctional agriculture. Producing woody biomass through short rotation coppices (SRC) provides an economic opportunity for farmers to diversify their agricultural income while potentially providing environmental benefits.Objective: Using multi-objective, robust optimization we investigate the extent to which SRC may help farmers to reconcile the economic objective of profit maximization with ecological concerns related to enhancing soil carbon and reducing the use of chemical inputs (nitrogen fertilizers and pesticides). Methods: To evaluate the costs and benefits of SRC relative to conventional agricultural crops, we use empiric and modelled data from Bavaria, Germany. Based on this performance data our optimization model determines the best mix of land-uses (land-use portfolio) for reconciling multiple objectives under uncertainty. We compare the optimal portfolios for two decision perspectives: profit oriented (in which the decision-maker only considers economic return) and multifunctional (in which the three ecological objectives are considered in addition to economic return). Both perspectives consider that farmers seek protection against downside risks.Results and conclusions: From the profit-oriented perspective, SRC was selected in the optimal portfolios (comprising 34% of the land area) derived for more risk-tolerant decision-makers, but was absent from the portfolio optimized for a strongly risk-averse decision-maker. Instead, higher woodchip prices may be required to make SRC economically attractive for strongly downside risk-averse farmers. In contrast, SRC was selected in the multifunctional portfolio (with 24-33% land-use shares) for all levels of risk aversion. We found that the selection of SRC helped to mitigate the financial costs of multifunctionality, increasing both the average and worst-case economic return of the multifunctional portfolio.Significance: Our study reveals new insights concerning the influence of uncertainties and downside risk associated with SRC on anticipated farmer decisions and suggests that cultivating SRC can help reduce trade-offs between economic and ecological objectives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available