4.7 Article

Multifidelity aerodynamic flow field prediction using random forest-based machine learning

Journal

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107449

Keywords

Flow field prediction; Random forest; Machine learning; Multifidelity modeling; Surrogate modeling

Funding

  1. Na-tional Science Foundation [1846862]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1846862] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel random forest-based machine learning algorithm is proposed to predict high-fidelity Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow fields. The algorithm shows promising results in three different cases and outperforms other methods in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
In this paper, a novel random forest (RF)-based multifidelity machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict the high-fidelity Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) flow field is proposed. The RF ML algorithm is used to increase the fidelity of a low-fidelity potential flow field. Three cases are studied, the first two consist of a flow past a backward-facing step, and the third, a subsonic flow around an airfoil. In the first case, the data is generated using ten different inlet velocities, in the second using six different step heights, and in the third using 20 different airfoil shapes parameterized using B-spline curves. Input parameters to RF are case dependent. For the first case, the x and y cell-center locations and the corresponding x and y potential flow velocities, along with the specified inlet velocity, are used. For the second, the cell-center values are nondimensionalized using the step height, and the step height is used in place of the inlet velocity. The remaining two input features used are the same as in the previous case. For the third case, the potential flow stream function and velocity potential along with the B-spline control point values are used as input variables. The outputs of the RF algorithm are the same for all the cases and include the RANS velocities, pressures, and turbulent viscosities. The results in this study are compared to those generated using the tensorFlowFoam (TFF) and from directly solving the RANS equations. To quantify the errors, the absolute error and relative L-2 norm error metrics are used. The results show that for the first two cases, RF consistently has two to 30 times lower relative L-2 norm compared to TFF, with the only exception being the turbulent viscosities for the second case. For the third case, RF is better at predicting the pressure and skin friction coefficients for the RAE 2822 airfoil compared to the NACA 0012 airfoil. The relative L-2 norm error is 1.67 and 1.19 times lower for the pressure and skin friction coefficients, respectively.(c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available