4.5 Article

Economic Evaluation of Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib as a First-line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination compared with sorafenib as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China and the United states

Feng Wen et al.

Summary: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination therapy as first-line treatment for unresectable HCC patients from the perspectives of Chinese and American payers. The combination therapy was found to be not cost-effective based on the willingness-to-pay threshold in both countries.

LIVER INTERNATIONAL (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Dan Su et al.

Summary: Cost-effectiveness evaluation of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma from the US payer perspective showed that the treatment is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with sorafenib. Lowering the prices of atezolizumab and bevacizumab may enhance cost-effectiveness, and tailoring treatments based on individual patient factors could also improve economic outcomes.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2021)

Article Oncology

Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study

Zhenggang Ren et al.

Summary: The study aimed to assess the efficacy of sintilimab plus IBI305 versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma in China, showing significant overall survival and progression-free survival benefits with acceptable safety profiles.

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab) in NSCLC

Shugeng Gao et al.

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Lenvatinib versus sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Hongfu Cai et al.

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2020)

Article Oncology

Expenditure of hospital care on cancer in China, from 2011 to 2015

Yue Cai et al.

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH (2017)

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Prognostic significance of adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

Alessandro Granito et al.

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY (2016)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

FOLFOX4 or sorafenib as the first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Pengfei Zhang et al.

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE (2016)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib as a first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Pengfei Zhang et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY (2015)

Article Oncology

Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer

A. Lloyd et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2006)