4.6 Article

An iterative method to reconstruct the refractive index of a medium from time-off-light measurements

Journal

INVERSE PROBLEMS
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/8/085009

Keywords

refractive index; time-of-flight measurement; Fermat's principle; Riemannian metric; geodesic curve; backprojection operator; ray transform

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Science Foundation, DFG) [1978/7-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article deals with a classical inverse problem: the computation of the refractive index of a medium from ultrasound time-of-flight measurements. This problem is very popular in seismics but also for tomographic problems in inhomogeneous media. For example ultrasound vector field tomography needs a priori knowledge of the sound speed. According to Fermat's principle ultrasound signals travel along geodesic curves of a Riemannian metric which is associated with the refractive index. The inverse problem thus consists of determining the index of refraction from integrals along geodesics curves associated with the integrand leading to a nonlinear problem. In this article we describe a numerical solver for this problem scheme based on an iterative minimization method for an appropriate Tikhonov functional. The outcome of the method is a stable approximation of the sought index of refraction as well as a corresponding set of geodesic curves. We prove some analytical convergence results for this method and demonstrate its performance by means of several numerical experiments. Another novelty in this article is the explicit representation of the backprojection operator for the ray transform in Riemannian geometry and its numerical realization relying on a corresponding phase function that is determined by the metric. This gives a natural extension of the conventional backprojection from 2D computerized tomography to inhomogeneous geometries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available