4.5 Editorial Material

Controversies in implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program COMMENT

Journal

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 101, Issue 6, Pages 577-580

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14351

Keywords

cell-free DNA screening; non-invasive prenatal testing; Norway; prenatal screening; public antenatal care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Women's autonomy and inclusive society are highly valued in Norway. However, implementing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in public antenatal care program is challenging due to controversy over screening for trisomies and lower prevalence of fetal trisomies in younger women. Organizing the service between private institutions and public hospitals also raises debate and challenges.
Women's autonomy and an inclusive society for all individuals are highly valued in Norway. The Norwegian Biotechnology Act changed in 2020 allowing first-trimester screening and cell-free DNA for common trisomies to all pregnant women. However, implementing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a public antenatal care program is difficult, because many patients, politicians, and medical professionals do not consider trisomy 21 a severe medical disease. Screening for trisomies at an early gestation might inevitably lead to an increase in pregnancy terminations and making cost-benefit calculations is ethically challenging. Moreover, offering NIPT to all pregnant women is debatable because of the lower prevalence of fetal trisomies in younger women. Therefore, appropriate genetic pre-test counseling is essential. Furthermore, organizing the service between private institutions and public hospitals poses another debate and challenges both quality and equal access to health services for women across the country.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available