4.5 Article

To like or not to like: Negotiating food assessments of children from families with a low socioeconomic position

Journal

APPETITE
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105853

Keywords

Food liking; Low socioeconomic position; Family mealtimes; Discursive psychology; Conversation analysis; Assessments

Funding

  1. Edema-Steernberg Foundation, Wageningen, the Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study analyzed video recordings of 79 evening meals in families with a low socioeconomic position to explore how primary school-aged children express their likes and dislikes of foods, and how their parents respond to these preferences. The findings revealed that children's likes were often ignored, while dislikes were treated as refusals or inappropriate claims. Parents were more likely to respond to assessments that involved social actions such as refusals and complaints. The study also emphasized the importance of distinguishing between assessments of general food items and assessments of food currently being eaten.
The present study explored how primary school-aged children from families with a low socioeconomic position produce 'likes' and 'dislikes' of foods during everyday family meals, and how these (dis)likes are understood and treated by their parents. It is crucial to understand how food preferences develop in the course of everyday life, as it is known that there are socioeconomic disparities in food preference and consumption, and that children from families with a low socioeconomic position have relatively poorer diets. Deploying an interactional approach to food preference, video recordings of 79 evening meals in families with a low socioeconomic position were analyzed using discursive psychology and conversation analysis. The analysis highlighted that children's food likes and dislikes were treated differently by their parents. While likes were routinely not responded to, agreed with or further elaborated, dislikes were predominantly oriented to as food refusals or treated as inappropriate, or non-genuine claims. Children's food assessments, i.e., likes and dislikes, were often disattended by parents when they appeared to be food preference displays. By contrast, assessments that accomplished social actions like refusals and complaints were more often responded to. The analysis also revealed the importance of distinguishing between assessments about food items in general, that were not currently being eaten, and assessments of food eaten here-and-now. All in all, the study evidences that and how assessment sequences open up interactional spaces where children and parents orient to and negotiate relative rights and responsibilities to know, to assess and to accomplish specific actions. Implications for food preference research are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available