4.8 Article

The influence of a biomimetic pulmonary surfactant modification on the in vivo fate of nanoparticles in the lung

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 391-402

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.038

Keywords

Pulmonary surfactants; Pulmonary delivery; Retention; Pharmacokinetic; Distribution

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFE0201700]
  2. Liaoning Provincial Higher Education Overseas Training Program [2019GJWZD005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the biomimetic modification of nanoparticles with endogenous surfactants was investigated to improve biocompatibility and minimize lung damage. Different phospholipids were used to modify paclitaxel (PTX)-loaded nanoparticles, leading to mucoadhesive or mucus penetration properties. The modification affected the uptake by different cells in the lung and retention in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, as well as PTX absorption in the lung tissue. The findings provide insights for the design of inhalable nanocarriers.
Direct biomimetic modification of nanoparticles (NPs) with endogenous surfactants is helpful to improve the biocompatibility of NPs and avoid damage to the physiological function of the lung. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate the influence of biomimetic endogenous pulmonary surfactant phospholipid modification on the in vivo fate of NPs after lung delivery. Here, two neutral phospholipids (dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), dipalmitoylphosphatidylamine (DPPE)) and two negatively charged phospholipids (dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol (DPPG), dipalmitoylphosphatidylserine (DPPS)) were selected to modify paclitaxel (PTX)-loaded PLGA NPs with different molar ratio. DPPC, DPPE, and DPPG improved mucoadhesion, in contrast, DPPS improved the mucus permeability of the NPs. Neutral DPPC and DPPE reduced, but negatively charged DPPS and DPPG increased the uptake by alveolar macrophages, all types of phospholipid increased the uptake by lung epithelial cells and increased PTX retention in the whole lung. Whereas, DPPC, DPPE, and DPPG promoted PTX retention in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), while DPPS promoted PTX absorption in the lung tissue. Only DPPS-PLGA (1:1) NPs remarkably increased PTX systemic exposure. A good correlation between PTX percentage in the supernatant of BALF and PTX concentration in plasma was established, implying PTX entered the system circulation mainly in molecular form. Phospholipid modification had no effect on extrapulmonary organ distribution of PTX. Taken together, our study disclosed that different phospholipid modification can endow the NPs mucoadhesive or mucus penetration and cellular uptake properties, with tunable retention in BALF and absorption in the lung tissue, providing the scientific background for translational nanocarrier design for inhalation as required. Statement of significance Inhaled nanomedicines will inevitably interact with pulmonary surfactant and form surfactant corona. However, the contribution of individual pulmonary surfactant phospholipid on the in vivo fate of nanomedicines is still unclear. In this regard, the most abundant pulmonary surfactant phospholipid dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine and dipalmitoylphosphatidylamine, and dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol and dipalmitoylphosphatidylserine were selected to modify the paclitaxel loaded PLGA nanoparticles and the effect of these pulmonary surfactant phospholipids on their in vivo fate was investigated. It was demonstrated that different phospholipid modification can endow the nanoparticles mu-coadhesive or mucus penetration properties, with tunable retention in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, alveolar macrophages uptake and absorption in the lung tissue. The present study provided a comprehensive understanding for the role of pulmonary surfactant phospholipid on inhaled nanomedicines. (c) 2022 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available