4.6 Article

Postorbital discard and chain of custody: The processing of artifacts returning to Earth from the International Space Station

Journal

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages 513-531

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.03.035

Keywords

International Space Station; Space archaeology; Science and technology studies; Discard practices; Chaine operatoire; Chain of custody; Process and procedure

Funding

  1. Wilkinson College of the Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences at Chapman University
  2. Australian Research Council [DP190102747]
  3. British Academy for the Newton International

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most items from the International Space Station do not return to Earth, posing a challenge for archaeologists who rely on material culture as primary evidence. By observing NASA contractors' processes for handling and returning items back to Earth, a deeper understanding of the meanings and associations of these objects can be gained.
Few items that comprise the material culture of the International Space Station ever return to Earth. Most are left on the station or placed on cargo resupply ships that burn up on atmospheric re-entry. This fact presents a challenge for archaeologists who use material culture as their primary evidence. Together with a sociologist, we observed the processes that have been developed by NASA contractors to handle and return items that come back to Earth on the Cargo Dragon vehicle. We observed two missions, CRS-13 and CRS-14, in January and May 2018, respectively, traveling to the locations of work and interviewing the contractors and associated staff. These observations are described here, using the lenses of archaeological understandings of discard practices, the anthropological concept of the chaine ope ' ratoire, and the forensic idea of chain of custody to interpret the meanings and associations of the various kinds of objects returned from space.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available