4.8 Article

Finetuning Hole-Extracting Monolayers for Efficient Organic Solar Cells

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages 16497-16504

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c01900

Keywords

organic solar cells; hole-transport layer; monolayer; 3PACz; nonfullerene acceptor

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [680.91.011]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science [024.001.035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interface engineering for hole extraction in organic solar cells has received little attention, but this study shows that by fine-tuning the chemical structure of carbazole-based self-assembled monolayers, improved performance can be achieved compared to the archetypal PEDOT:PSS material.
Interface layers used for electron transport (ETL) and hole transport (HTL) often significantly enhance the performance of organic solar cells (OSCs). Surprisingly, interface engineering for hole extraction has received little attention thus far. By finetuning the chemical structure of carbazole-based self-assembled monolayers with phosphonic acid anchoring groups, varying the length of the alkane linker (2PACz, 3PACz, and 4PACz), these HTLs were found to perform favorably in OSCs. Compared to archetypal PEDOT:PSS, the PACz monolayers exhibit higher optical transmittance and lower resistance and deliver a higher short-circuit current density and fill factor. Power conversion efficiencies of 17.4% have been obtained with PM6:BTP-eC9 as the active layer, which was distinctively higher than the 16.2% obtained with PEDOT:PSS. Of the three PACz derivatives, the new 3PACz consistently outperforms the other two monolayer HTLs in OSCs with different state-of-the-art nonfullerene acceptors. Considering its facile synthesis, convenient processing, and improved performance, we consider that 3PACz is a promising interface layer for widespread use in OSCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available