4.8 Article

How Fluorine Introduction Solves the Spinel Transition, a Fundamental Problem of Mn-Based Positive Electrodes

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 14, Issue 21, Pages 24321-24331

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c02868

Keywords

lithium-ion battery; positive electrode; lithium manganese oxide; spinel; operando XRD-XAFS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we found that Li1.12Mn0.74O1.60F0.40 positive electrodes with a loose-crystalline rock salt structure show stable and high capacity, with little change in the charge-discharge curve. The introduction of F-Mn bonds in the positive electrode suppresses the local spinel transition in Mn-based positive electrodes.
In pursuit of high-capacity Mn-based oxides as positive electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries, the changes in the charge-discharge curve due to the spinet transition still stand in the way of the cycling stability. We found in this study that Li1.12Mn0.74O1.60F0.40 (LMOF05) positive electrodes with a loose-crystalline rock salt structure (LCRS), in which F is placed near Mn, show a stable and high capacity (300 mA h g(-1), 952 W h kg(-1)) with little change in the charge-discharge curve. We demonstrated by F K-edge soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD) that a part of F in the LCRS positive electrode forms F-Mn bonds. Operando XRD/X-ray absorption fine structure measurements revealed the lattice size and Mn surrounding environment during charge/discharge of F-containing LCRS positive electrodes (LMOF05), LCRS-LiMnO2 (LMO), and a spinel-like Li1.1Al0.1Mn1.8O4 positive electrode (SPINEL). Micro- and macroscopic structural changes indicate how the introduction of F suppresses the local spinel transition in Mn-based positive electrodes. These findings should be an effective tool for applying Co-free positive electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available