Journal
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 725-742Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2080549
Keywords
Retractions; scientific misconduct; Brazil; Portugal
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article assessed the development of health science retractions in Brazil and Portugal and described their characteristics. The findings showed an increase in the number of retractions over time, with plagiarism being the most frequent cause of misconduct. The time from publication to retraction decreased as the journal's quartile increased.
The retraction of health sciences publications is a growing concern. To understand the patterns in a particular country-context and design specific measures to address the problem, it is important to describe and characterize retractions. We aimed to assess the evolution of health science retractions in Brazil and Portugal and to describe their features. We conducted a cross-sectional study including all health sciences retracted articles with at least one author affiliated to a Portuguese or Brazilian institution identified through Retraction Watch database. A total of 182 retracted articles were identified. The number of retractions increased over time, but the proportion related to the whole of publications remained stable. A total of 50.0% and 60.8% of the Portuguese and Brazilian retracted articles, respectively, were published in first and second quartile journals. Scientific misconduct accounted for 60.1% and 55.9% of retractions in Brazil and Portugal. In both countries, the most frequent cause of misconduct was plagiarism. The time from publication to retraction decreases as the journal quartile increases. The retraction of health sciences articles did not decrease over time in Brazil and Portugal. There is a need to develop strategies aimed at preventing, monitoring and managing scientific misconduct according to the country context.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available