Journal
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 707-724Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2078712
Keywords
Authorship disputes; plagiarism publish or perish; qualitative research; research misbehaviors
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Despite evidence of increasing research misconduct in India, little attention has been paid to understanding young Indian researchers' perception of research integrity and misconduct. This study conducted interviews with 30 research scholars at Pondicherry University to understand their experiences and views on misconduct. The top three factors influencing misconduct were lack of funds, pressure from supervisors, and the urgency to publish. Plagiarism was the most frequently mentioned cause of misconduct, and instances of authorship conflicts were also common.
Despite ample evidence of increasing research misconduct in India, little attention has been paid to understanding researchers' perception of research integrity and research misconduct among young Indian researchers. Interviews among 30 research scholars were conducted at Pondicherry University in India to understand their experience and perception of research misconduct. The top three influencing factors for scientific misconduct, according to the participants, were unavailability of adequate funds (35%), pressure from research supervisors (29%), and desperation to publish articles (25%). The participants had witnessed research misconduct in different forms i.e., data fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. However, plagiarism was the most often cited cause of misbehavior in our interviews. Majority of participants have witnessed or personally encountered multiple instances where authorship conflicts occurred. The other questionable research practices highlighted in the study were improper citations, authorship disputes like gift and ghost authorships, misrepresentation of statistical data, failure to publish negative results. In an increasingly diverse and changing research environment, our research calls for practical research guidelines based on honesty, openness, and accountability that can help articulate and strengthen scientists' core values. More importantly, scientific misconduct can only be prevented by using a multifaceted strategy that includes identifying instances of scientific misconduct and implementing suitable deterrents and treatments that could change the behavior associated with such misconduct.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available