4.6 Article

Differences Between Ipsilateral and Contralateral Early Parenchymal Enhancement Kinetics Predict Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy

Journal

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 1469-1479

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.02.008

Keywords

breast cancer imaging; ultrafast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI); background parenchymal enhancement (BPE); background parenchymal kinetics; bilateral asymmetry

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [U01 CA142565, R01 CA172801, 1U24 CA226110, 1F32 CA265232]
  2. Segal Family Foundation
  3. University of Chicago Cancer Center
  4. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [CPRIT RP160005]
  5. SPORE [5P20 CA233307-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that breast cancer patients with similar kinetic parameters in ipsi- and contra-lateral normal parenchyma before NAT were more likely to achieve pathologic complete response. Patients classified as RCB II after NAT showed higher values in normal parenchyma and tumor kinetics.
Rationale and Objectives: To determine whether kinetics measured with ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in tumor and normal parenchyma pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) can predict the response of breast cancer to NAT.Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients with histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer were enrolled. They were scanned with ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (3-7 seconds/frame) pre- and post-NAT. Four kinetic parameters were calculated in the segmented tumors, and ipsi- and contra-lateral normal parenchyma: (1) tumor (tSE30) or background parenchymal relative enhancement at 30 seconds (BPE30), (2) maximum relative enhancement slope (MaxSlope), (3) bolus arrival time (BAT), and (4) area under relative signal enhancement curve for the initial 30 seconds (AUC30). The tumor kinetics and the differences between ipsi- and contra-lateral parenchymal kinetics were compared for patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) vs those who had residual disease after NAT. The chi-squared test and two-sided t-test were used for baseline demographics. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and oneway analysis of variance were used for differential responses to therapy.Results: Patients with similar pre-NAT mean BPE30, median BAT and mean AUC30 in the ipsi- and contralateral normal parenchyma were more likely to achieve pCR following NAT (p < 0.02). Patients classified as having residual cancer burden (RCB) II after NAT showed higher post-NAT tSE30 and tumor AUC30 and higher post-NAT MaxSlope in ipsilateral normal parenchyma compared to those classified as RCB I or pCR (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Bilateral asymmetry in normal parenchyma could predict treatment outcome prior to NAT. Post-NAT tumor kinetics could evaluate the aggressiveness of residual tumor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available