4.6 Article

Early Outcomes of a New NIH Program to Support Research in Residency

Journal

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
Volume 97, Issue 9, Pages 1305-1310

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004643

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number of physician-investigators in the United States has declined in recent decades due to the lack of mentored research opportunities during clinical training. In response, the National Institutes of Health initiated the R38 program to support mentored research opportunities for residents. The program has shown early positive outcomes, including increased likelihood of resident-investigators pursuing physician-investigator careers and greater clarity in their research directions.
The work of physician-investigators has historically led to key discoveries and developments in modern medicine, but recent decades have seen significant declines in the number of U.S. physician-investigators. One of the barriers to physicians participating in research is the lack of mentored research opportunities during clinical training, especially during residency training. In response to this identified barrier and to expand the physician-investigator workforce, the National Institutes of Health initiated the R38 program, known as Stimulating Access to Research in Residency, to support mentored research opportunities for residents. This article reports on the early outcomes of the recipients of the initial round of R38 awards, granted in 2018. Early positive outcomes include increases in the reported likelihood of resident-investigators pursuing physician-investigator careers, greater reported clarity in resident-investigators' research directions, the commitment of additional institutional resources to support the R38-awarded programs, and the approval of resident-investigators as having met training requirements for certification by multiple medical boards.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available