4.3 Article

Study on the Multi-wavelength Emissivity of GCr15 Steel and its Application on Temperature Measurement for Continuous Casting Billets

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS
Volume 37, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-016-2142-1

Keywords

GCr15 steel; Multi-wavelength emissivity; Multi-wavelength thermometry; Surface oxidization

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [N130304005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method for measuring the multi-wavelength emissivity of a steel surface is proposed, and an applicable experimental apparatus is designed. Multi-wavelength radiant energy emitted from a sample was measured using a fiber-optic spectrometer and its temperature measured using a NiCrSi/NiSiMg thermocouple. Utilizing the unique vacuum control and background noise-shielding systems, we investigated the multi-wavelength emissivity of GCr15 steel at three different degrees of surface oxidation at temperatures ranging from 1000 degrees C to 1100 degrees C. The experimental results show that the multi-wavelength (0.7 mu m-0.9 mu m) emissivity increased substantially, from 0.409-0.565 to 0.609-0.702, once the steel was oxidized. In addition, the emissivity increased slightly with increasing temperature, but the trends for emissivity and wavelength were similar. To measure the surface temperature of casting billets based on multi-wavelength thermometry, the functional relationships between emissivity and wavelength at different extents of oxidation were determined. Temperature measurements based on our technique were compared with those from common colorimetric thermometry. Our approach reduced the temperature fluctuation from +/- 23 degrees C to +/- 3.5 degrees C, indicating that a reliable measurement of the multi-wavelength emissivity of GCr15 steel is obtained using this experimental apparatus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available