4.6 Article

Limit analysis of transversally loaded masonry walls using an innovative macroscopic strength criterion

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 274-293

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.12.004

Keywords

Masonry; Homogenization; Transverse loads; Method of Cells; Limit analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The macroscopic strength properties of masonry walls with joints of finite thickness subjected to out-of-plane loads are estimated following an approach similar to the so-called Method of Cells for fiber-reinforced composites. A typical representative volume is subdivided into a few sub-cells, and a strain-rate periodic, piece wise differentiable transverse velocity field, depending on a limited number of degrees of freedom, is defined. Upper bounds to the macroscopic strength domain of the wall in the space of the macroscopic bending and twisting moments are obtained by applying the kinematic theorem of limit analysis within the framework of homogenization theory for periodic media. The approximated macroscopic failure surfaces are in good agreement with the 'exact' ones, available in the literature for infinitely strong units and infinitely thin joints, and with those obtainable by accurate 2D and 3D numerical models, at a much higher computational cost, for units of limited strength and joints of finite thickness. The influence of compressive in-plane loads and of the joint thickness on the macroscopic out-of-plane strength of the wall is also numerically investigated. Finally, the proposed model is applied to the prediction of the bearing capacity of laterally loaded masonry elements: the accuracy of the numerical predictions is assessed by comparisons with available experimental results and with more refined numerical models proposed by other authors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available