4.6 Article

In-plane crushing of a hierarchical honeycomb

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 85-86, Issue -, Pages 57-66

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.003

Keywords

Hierarchical honeycomb; Collapse stress; Impact; Analytical modeling; Finite element method

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11472149]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB351900]
  3. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [2014z22074]
  4. European Seventh Framework Programme through the International Research Staff Exchange Scheme [IRSES IPACTS 2010-268696]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Properly introduced hierarchy in cellular materials has the potential to further improve their energy absorption capacity. The in-plane uniaxial collapse response of a second order hierarchical honeycomb (i.e., a regular hexagonal honeycomb with its cell walls consisting of an equilateral triangular honeycomb) is investigated. Its failure modes for quasi-static crushing and dynamic impact in two directions are systematically explored by finite element simulations. A two-scale method is proposed and analytical expressions for the quasi-static collapse stresses of the hierarchical honeycomb in the two directions are obtained. In conjunction with the conservation of momentum, the analytical quasi-static collapse stress models are extended to dynamic crushing. The obtained theoretical collapse stresses are validated by finite element simulations for a wide range of impact velocity and relative density. Both numerical and analytical results show that the hierarchical honeycomb has an improved collapse stress over traditional hexagonal and triangular honeycombs. The improvement is found to be more pronounced for low velocity impact than for high velocity impact. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available