4.7 Article

Asymptotically optimal sampling-based kinodynamic planning

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 528-564

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0278364915614386

Keywords

Motion planning; asymptotic optimality; sampling-based algorithms; kinodynamic planning; steering functions

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [IIS-1451737, CCF-1330789]
  2. NASA [NNX13AL71H]
  3. NASA [469977, NNX13AL71H] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1451737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sampling-based algorithms are viewed as practical solutions for high-dimensional motion planning. Recent progress has taken advantage of random geometric graph theory to show how asymptotic optimality can also be achieved with these methods. Achieving this desirable property for systems with dynamics requires solving a two-point boundary value problem (BVP) in the state space of the underlying dynamical system. It is difficult, however, if not impractical, to generate a BVP solver for a variety of important dynamical models of robots or physically simulated ones. Thus, an open challenge was whether it was even possible to achieve optimality guarantees when planning for systems without access to a BVP solver. This work resolves the above question and describes how to achieve asymptotic optimality for kinodynamic planning using incremental sampling-based planners by introducing a new rigorous framework. Two new methods, STABLE_SPARSE_RRT (SST) and SST*, result from this analysis, which are asymptotically near-optimal and optimal, respectively. The techniques are shown to converge fast to high-quality paths, while they maintain only a sparse set of samples, which makes them computationally efficient. The good performance of the planners is confirmed by experimental results using dynamical systems benchmarks, as well as physically simulated robots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available