4.6 Article

Improving estimates of fractional vegetation cover based on UAV in alpine grassland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 1922-1936

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1165884

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China Special Fund for Meteorological Research in the Public Interest [GYHY201306017]
  2. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation Commission [41271089, 41422102, 41501081]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences [SKLCS-ZZ-2015-2-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is an important parameter in studies of ecosystem balance, soil erosion, and climate change. Remote-sensing inversion is a common approach to estimating FVC. However, there is an important gap between ground-based surveys (quadrat level) and remote-sensing imagery (satellite image pixel scale) from satellites. In this study we evaluated that gap with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) aerial images of alpine grassland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP). The results showed that: (1) the most accurate estimations of FVC came from UAV (FVCUAV) at the satellite image pixel scale, and when FVC was estimated using ground-based surveys (FVCground), the accuracy increased as the number of quadrats used increased and was inversely proportional to the heterogeneity of the underlying surface condition; (2) the UAV method was more efficient than conventional ground-based survey methods at the satellite image pixel scale; and (3) the coefficient of determination (R-2) between FVCUAV and vegetation indices (VIs) was significantly greater than that between FVCground and VIs (p < 0.05, n = 5). Our results suggest that the use of UAV to estimate FVC at the satellite image pixel scale provides more accurate results and is more efficient than conventional ground-based survey methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available