4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Updating residual stem volume estimates using ALS-and UAV-acquired stereo-photogrammetric point clouds

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume 38, Issue 8-10, Pages 2938-2953

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1219425

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To improve precision management and the cost effectiveness of forest practices, we investigate a pre-harvest airborne laser scanning (ALS) forest inventory with an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) acquired post-harvest digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) inventory to identify the location and residual volume of stands following selection harvesting. ALS data and field measurements collected pre-harvest in 2013 (T-1) and UAV imagery collected post-harvest in 2015 (T2) were processed to produce analogous point clouds of the study area near Williams Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH), and species were recorded from systematically located variable radius plots subsequent to ALS and DAP collection. Point cloud metrics and field measurements from each data set were used to create T-1 ALS and T-2 DAP predictive volume models. Direct and indirect volume change estimates were created from the difference between T-1 ALS and T-2 DAP model results. The estimated root mean square error (RMSE) for volume was 17.34% and 18.50% for the 2013 ALS and 2015 DAP models, respectively. The indirect and direct models predicting volume change produced errors of 16.65% and 86.56%, respectively. Results achieved from ALS and DAP models indicate strong potential for inventories generated using UAV-acquired DAP to estimate the quantity and location of residual volume after harvest operations, and could be applied in tandem to act as a semi-automated inventory cycling method to improve operational efficiency and cost effectiveness in Canadian forest management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available