3.8 Article

Gender differences in drug titration among heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in the ETIFIC trial

Journal

REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA
Volume 75, Issue 8, Pages 636-648

Publisher

EDICIONES DOYMA S A
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.11.002

Keywords

Titration; Drug; Heart failure; Women; Female; Gender; Sex; Differences

Funding

  1. Carlos III Health Research Institute [FIS PI14/01208]
  2. European Regional Development Fund
  3. Government of the Basque Country [2014111143]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a post hoc analysis of the HF-titration ETIFIC trial, there were no significant gender differences in drug dosage, cardiovascular mortality, and HF hospitalizations.
Introduction and objectives: Optimal medical therapy decreases mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Women have been underrepresented in clinical trials and not specifically evaluated. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of drug titration in women vs men. Methods: This post hoc gender study of the ETIFIC multicenter randomized trial included hospitalized patients with new-onset HF with reduced ejection fraction and New York Heart Association II-III and no contraindications to beta-blockers. A structured 4-month titration process was implemented in HF clinics. The primary endpoint was the mean relative dose (% of target dose) of beta-blockers achieved by women vs men. Secondary endpoints included the mean relative doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, adverse events, and other clinical outcomes at 6 months. Results: A total of 320 patients were included, 83 (25.93%) women and 237 (74.06%) men (76 vs 213 analyzed). The mean +/- standard deviation of the relative doses achieved by women vs men were as follows: beta-blockers 62.08% +/- 30.72% vs 64.4% +/- 32.77%, with a difference of -2.32% (95%CI, -10.58-5.94), P = .580; and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists 79.85% +/- 27.72% vs 67.29% +/- 31.43%, P = .003. No other differences in drug dosage were found. Multivariate analysis showed nonsignificant differences. CV mortality was 1 (1.20%) vs 3 (1.26%), P = 1, and HF hospitalizations 0 (0.00%) vs 10 (4.22%), P = .125. Conclusions: In a post hoc analysis from the HF-titration ETIFIC trial, we found nonsignificant gender differences in drug dosage, cardiovascular mortality, and HF hospitalizations. (C) 2021 Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available