3.8 Article

Inhibitory Effects of Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.) Extract and Its Active Compound Isochlorogenic Acid A on Sarcopenia

Journal

PREVENTIVE NUTRITION AND FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 408-416

Publisher

KOREAN SOC FOOD SCIENCE NUTRITION
DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2021.26.4.408

Keywords

Chrysanthemum morifolium; isochlorogenic acid A; protein turnover; sarcopenia

Funding

  1. World Class 300 Project RD Program [S2435140]
  2. Small and Medium Business Administration (SMBA, Republic of Korea)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that CME and IcA can promote muscle protein synthesis and inhibit protein degradation pathways, leading to improved muscle strength and volume in middle-aged mice, suggesting their potential role in delaying sarcopenia.
Sarcopenia, age-related muscle atrophy, weakening muscle strength, and exercise capacity, generally accompany imbalances in protein metabolism. Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. extract (CME) and its active compound, isochlorogenic acid A (IcA), have been reported to have anti-oxidative, anti-diabetic, and neuroprotective effects. However, the roles of CME and IcA in the regulation of muscle protein turnover-related signaling pathways to attenuate sarcopenia have not been explored. In this study, we investigated CME and IcA based regulation of protein turnover in synthesizing muscle in vitro and in vivo. At the molecular level, CME and IcA promoted phosphorylation of PI3K/Akt and mTOR pathways, which stimulate synthesis of muscle proteins, and suppressed FoxO3a and E3 ubiquitin ligases during protein degradation. In vivo, CME and IcA increased grip strength, exercise capacity, muscle mass and volume, and cross-sectional area of myofibers in middle-aged C57BL/6J mice. These results suggest that CME and IcA may have roles as functional food supplements for delaying sarcopenia by enhancing muscle mass recovery and function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available