4.6 Article

Mapping inland water carbon content with Landsat 8 data

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume 37, Issue 13, Pages 2950-2961

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1186852

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Estonian Science Foundation [8576, 8654]
  2. KESTA program project VeeObs
  3. Estonian Basic Science Research Grant [SF0180009s11]
  4. Swedish FORMAS project
  5. Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (Agencia Nacional de Energia Eletrica - ANEEL) [8000003629]
  6. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) [2011/23594-8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Landsat 8 is the first Earth observation satellite with sufficient radiometric and spatial resolution to allow global mapping of lake CDOM and DOC (coloured dissolved organic matter and dissolved organic carbon, respectively) content. Landsat 8 is a multispectral sensor however, the number of potentially usable band ratios, or more sophisticated indices, is limited. In order to test the suitability of the ratio most commonly used in lake carbon content mapping, the green-red band ratio, we carried out fieldwork in Estonian and Brazilian lakes. Several atmospheric correction methods were also tested in order to use image data where the image-to-image variability due to illumination conditions would be minimal. None of the four atmospheric correction methods tested, produced reflectance spectra that matched well with in situ measured reflectance. Nevertheless, the green-red band ratio calculated from the reflectance data was in correlation with measured CDOM values. In situ data show that there is a strong correlation between CDOM and DOC concentrations in Estonian and Brazilian lakes. Thus, mapping the global CDOM and DOC content from Landsat 8 is plausible but more data from different parts of the world are needed before decisions can be made about the accuracy of such global estimation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available