4.6 Article

Comparison of Machine Learning methods applied to the estimation of manufacturing cost of jet engine components

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 109-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.05.006

Keywords

Machine Learning cost model; Manufacturing cost; Economic production function; Design-to-cost; Gradient boosted trees; Support vector regression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper compares the performance of five statistical models on the estimation of manufacturing cost of jet engine components, during the early design phase and using real industrial data. The analysis shows that recent techniques such as Gradient Boosted Trees and Support Vector Regression are up to two times more efficient than the ones typically encountered in the literature (Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Networks). If goodness-of-fit and predictive accuracy remain crucial to assess the performance of a model, other criteria such as computational cost, easiness to train or interpretability should be considered when selecting a statistical method for estimating the manufacturing cost of mechanical parts. Ideally, cost estimators should rely on several statistical models concurrently, as their distinct characteristics yield complementary views on the drivers of manufacturing cost. Finally, some engineering insights revealed by the statistical analysis are presented. They include the ranking and quantification of the most important cost drivers, the approximation of the economic production function of component cost according to accumulated production volume and a different view on the traditional breakdown of manufacturing cost of some jet engine components. As a conclusion, Machine Learning appears to be an effective, affordable, accurate and scalable technique to cost mechanical parts in the early stage of the design process. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available