3.8 Article

Interactive Effects of Residue and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Melon

Journal

AGRIVITA
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 635-647

Publisher

BRAWIJAYA UNIV, FAC AGRICULTURE
DOI: 10.17503/agrivita.v43i3.2968

Keywords

Conservation tillage; Melon; Residue; Tillage methods

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Field experiments showed that conventional tillage with 30% residue treatment had the highest yield and growth indicators for melon, indicating that this combination was the most effective in maximizing yield. Conservation tillage treatments also showed optimal values for most growth indicators.
Field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of residue and tillage on growth and yield of melon. Tillage treatments included conventional tillage (using a moldboard plough and two passes with a disk harrow), minimum tillage (one pass with a disk harrow), and no tillage (NT). Residue treatments included the application of 0%, 30% and 60% residue. Yield and yield components were obtained for all treatments. Tillage significantly affected yield and its components (P <= 0.05). The maximum FWPP (2.678 kg), NFPP (6.799), D (18.49 cm), L (45.93 cm), S (12.51%) and RUE (2.470) and yield (16.17 t/ha) were recorded in the conventional tillage treatment. Also, maximum FWPP (2.192 kg), NFPP (5.353), D (16.66 cm), L (39.52 cm) and yield (12.83 t/ha) were observed in the 30% residue treatment. In terms of the interaction effects, maximum FWPP (2.850 kg), NFPP (6.790), D (20.71 cm), L (53.53 cm) and yield (17.09 t/ha) were obtained in the conventional tillage + 30% residue treatment. Therefore, the use of a moldboard plough followed by two passes with a disk harrow, in concert with 30% residue treatment, were maximizing the yield Almost all growth indicators had the optimum values in the conservation tillage treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available