4.7 Article

Systemic delivery of artemether by dissolving microneedles

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 508, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.006

Keywords

Dissolving microneedles; Artemether; Poorly water-soluble drugs; Intradermal delivery

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31300763]
  2. Science Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dissolving microneedles (DMNs) based transdermal delivery is an attractive drug delivery approach with minimal invasion. However, it is still challenging to load poorly water-soluble drugs in DMNs for systemic delivery. The aim of the study was to develop DMNs loaded with artemether (ARM) as a model drug, to enable efficient drug penetration through skin for systemic absorption and distribution. The microconduits created by microneedles were imaged by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and the insertion depth was suggested to be about 270 mu m. The maximum amount of ARM delivered into skin was 72.67 +/- 2.69% of the initial dose loaded on DMNs preparation. Pharmacokinetics study in rats indicated a dose-dependent profile of plasma ARM concentrations, after ARM-loaded DMNs treatment. In contrast to intramuscular injection, DMNs application resulted in lower peak plasma levels, but higher plasma ARM concentration at 8 h after administration. There were no significant difference in area under the curve and bioavailability between DMNs group and intramuscular group (P > 0.05). Pharmacodynamics studies performed in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rats showed that ARM-loaded DMNs could reverse paw edema, similar to ARM intramuscular injection. In conclusion, developed DMNs provided a potential minimally invasive route for systemic delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available