4.7 Article

Novel high/low solubility classification methods for new molecular entities

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 511, Issue 1, Pages 111-126

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.06.060

Keywords

Solubility; High throughput technologies; Analytical chemistry; Computational ADME; In silico modeling; Computer aided drug design; ROC curve analysis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01DA023223]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research describes a rapid solubility classification approach that could be used in the discovery and development of new molecular entities. Compounds (N = 635) were divided into two groups based on information available in the literature: high solubility (BDDCS/BCS 1/3) and low solubility (BDDCS/BCS 2/4). We established decision rules for determining solubility classes using measured log solubility in molar units (MLogS(M)) or measured solubility (MSol) in mg/ml units. ROC curve analysis was applied to determine statistically significant threshold values of MSol and MLogS(M). Results indicated that NMEs with MLogS(M) > -3.05 or MSol > 0.30 mg/mL will have >= 85% probability of being highly soluble and new molecular entities with MLogS(M) < -3.05 or MSol < 0.30 mg/mL will have >85% probability of being poorly soluble. When comparing solubility classification using the threshold values of MLogS(M) or MSol with BDDCS, we were able to correctly classify 85% of compounds. We also evaluated solubility classification of an independent set of 108 orally administered drugs using MSol (0.3 mg/mL) and our method correctly classified 81% and 95% of compounds into high and low solubility classes, respectively. The high/low solubility classification using MLogS(M) or MSol is novel and independent of traditionally used dose number criteria. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available