3.8 Article

Information needs and delivery channels: Experimental evidence from Cambodian smallholders

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/03400352211057148

Keywords

Extension services; didactics; pictures; audio; multisensory learning; poverty

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite policy interventions, poverty still exists, especially in rural areas of low-income countries that suffer from information asymmetry and market failure. The growth of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in remote areas shows promise in reducing the information barriers faced by the rural poor. However, there is little evidence on the effectiveness of delivery channels. This study investigates the information needs of smallholders and identifies multisensory instructions as the most effective ICT delivery channel.
Despite numerous policy interventions, poverty still exists. Those most harshly affected are people living in rural areas of low-income countries, regions that are often characterized by information asymmetries leading to market failure. The widespread growth of information and communications technologies (ICTs) in remote areas across the world holds immense potential for lifting the information barriers of the rural poor. However, there is little evidence of the effectiveness of delivery channels, which might be one reason why digital advice differs in its impact. Seeking to ascertain how smallholders can best be served by ICT, the authors investigated information needs and effective ICT delivery channels. Sociodemographic and ICT-related data was collected and a framed field experiment was conducted with smallholders in Cambodia; they were asked to build an object while using various delivery channels for instruction. Employing different regression techniques and matching algorithms, the experiment reveals that multisensory instructions trump all others.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available