4.2 Article

Risk factors for pediatric post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.03.005

Keywords

Pediatric tonsillectomy; Hemorrhage; Risk factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine pre-operative risk factors for post-tonsillectomy secondary hemorrhage in children, and quantify the magnitude of their risk. Materials and methods: Retrospective case-control study of all pediatric tonsillectomy patients experiencing post-operative bleeding from 2005 to 2010 in a community practice consisting of three fellowship-trained pediatric otolaryngologists were identified. The 91 cases were matched with 151 controls that underwent tonsillectomy by the same surgeon on the same day as each identified case. All charts were reviewed, and 41 pre-operative variables were extracted and statistically analyzed with contingency and regression analysis to calculate significance and odds ratios. Results: Three significant predictors of post-operative bleeding were identified. Performing a tonsillectomy on a child with recurrent tonsillitis (vs. other indications) increased the risk of postoperative hemorrhage by 4.5 times (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence intervals 2.41-8.38). Performing a tonsillectomy on a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) increased the risk by 8.7 times (p = 0.029, 95%Cl 1.4-53.6). Older children were more predisposed to post-operative bleeding. For every increase in age by one year, the hemorrhage risk increased by 1.1 times (p = 0.0025, 95%Cl 1.032-1.162). Children 11 years of age and older had double the risk of bleeding compared to younger children (odds ratio 1.98, p = 0.0381, 95%Cl 1.04-3.79). None of the remaining 38 variables showed significant differences between cases and controls. Conclusions: The risk of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage is significantly increased in older children and those with recurrent tonsillitis and ADHD. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available