Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 1478-1484Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.05.020
Keywords
heat generation; infrared thermography; implant site preparation; dental implants; bone surgery
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of bone density and drilling protocol on heat generation during implant bed preparation. Ten single and 10 gradual implant sites with diameters of 2.8, 3.5, and 4.2 mm were prepared in four artificial bone blocks (density types I-IV; D1-D4). Drilling was done at constant speed (1500 rpm) and with external irrigation (50 ml/min); vertical speed was set at 2 mm/s. An infrared camera was used for temperature measurements. Significantly higher temperatures for single drilling were found between 2.8-mm drills in D1 (P = 0.0014) and D4 (P < 0.0001) and between 3.5-mm drills in D3 (P = 0.0087) and D4 (P < 0.0001), as well as between 4.2-mm drills in D1 (P < 0.0001) and D4 (P = 0.0014). Low bone density led to a thermal decrease after single drilling and a thermal increase after gradual drilling. Burs with a large diameter always showed a higher temperature generation. In comparisons between 2.8- and 4.2-mm diameters for both single and gradual drills, significant differences (P < 0.001) were noted for bone types II, III, and IV. Single drilling could generate more heat than traditional sequential drilling, and bone density, as well as drill diameter, influenced thermal increases. Particularly in lower-density bone, conventional sequential drilling seems to raise the temperature less.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available