4.0 Article

Symbolic AI for XAI: Evaluating LFIT Inductive Programming for Explaining Biases in Machine Learning

Journal

COMPUTERS
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/computers10110154

Keywords

explainable artificial intelligence; inductive logic programming; fair recruitment; fair income level; propositional logic

Funding

  1. project PRIMA [H2020-MSCA-ITN-2019-860315]
  2. project TRESPASS-ETN [H2020-MSCA-ITN-2019-860813]
  3. project IDEA-FAST [IMI2-2018-15-853981]
  4. project BIBECA [RTI2018-101248-B-I00 MINECO/FEDER, RTI2018-095232-B-C22 MINECO]
  5. [RTI2018-101248-B-I00]
  6. [PID2019-111430RB-I00 MINECO]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study highlights the importance of machine learning in biometrics and personal information processing, focusing on the role of ILP and LFIT techniques in providing explanatory systems and their application in fair recruitment scenarios. By testing the performance of LFIT on real dataset, the authors verified its applicability in different domains and machine learning paradigms.
Machine learning methods are growing in relevance for biometrics and personal information processing in domains such as forensics, e-health, recruitment, and e-learning. In these domains, white-box (human-readable) explanations of systems built on machine learning methods become crucial. Inductive logic programming (ILP) is a subfield of symbolic AI aimed to automatically learn declarative theories about the processing of data. Learning from interpretation transition (LFIT) is an ILP technique that can learn a propositional logic theory equivalent to a given black-box system (under certain conditions). The present work takes a first step to a general methodology to incorporate accurate declarative explanations to classic machine learning by checking the viability of LFIT in a specific AI application scenario: fair recruitment based on an automatic tool generated with machine learning methods for ranking Curricula Vitae that incorporates soft biometric information (gender and ethnicity). We show the expressiveness of LFIT for this specific problem and propose a scheme that can be applicable to other domains. In order to check the ability to cope with other domains no matter the machine learning paradigm used, we have done a preliminary test of the expressiveness of LFIT, feeding it with a real dataset about adult incomes taken from the US census, in which we consider the income level as a function of the rest of attributes to verify if LFIT can provide logical theory to support and explain to what extent higher incomes are biased by gender and ethnicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available