3.8 Article

Monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy in the UK: A national study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS), UK Teratology Information Service (UKTIS) and Vaccination in Pregnancy (VIP) safety monitoring systems

Journal

OBSTETRIC MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 40-47

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1753495X221076713

Keywords

SARS-coV-2; COVID-19 vaccine; vaccination; pregnancy; pharmacovigilance; teratology; obstetric surveillance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses a national study on the vaccination of pregnant women with COVID-19 vaccines and presents preliminary data collected up to June 15, 2021. The results show that the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine is the most common, with most women being vaccinated in their second or third trimester mainly due to occupational infection risk.
Background: COVID-19 vaccines are protective against disease. Pregnant women benefit from vaccination as they are at higher risk of poor maternal and neonatal outcomes following infection. Methods: Following regulatory approval of two COVID-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom, a rapid national study of vaccination in pregnancy was instituted using three existing safety surveillance platforms: UKOSS, UKTIS and VIP. This preliminary report describes the data collected up to the 15(th) June 2021. Results: There were 971 reports of COVID-19 vaccination in the UKOSS/UKTIS (n = 493) and VIP (n = 478) monitoring systems describing 908 individual pregnancies. Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccination was most common (n = 501, 55.2%), most women were vaccinated in their second or third trimester (n = 566, 62.3%), and were mainly vaccinated due to occupational infection risk (n = 577, 63.5%). Conclusion: Obstetric outcome data will be obtained by December 2021. However, women should not delay vaccination whilst awaiting further safety data to emerge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available