Journal
ASIAN STUDIES REVIEW
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 272-292Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2021.1983519
Keywords
Sri Lanka; populist nationalism; reconciliation; peacebuilding; securitisation; social polarisation; leadership; illiberalism
Categories
Funding
- University of New England, Australia
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article examines the impact of populist nationalism on Sri Lanka's 'illiberal' peacebuilding, identifying three main dimensions and their relationships, as well as their exacerbation of social conflicts.
This article examines Sri Lanka's 'illiberal' peacebuilding through the lens of what is referred to as populist nationalism, a distinct form of post-war political order characterised by nationalist politics with a populist orientation. It shows that the notion of 'victor's peace' has facilitated a shift from ethnolinguistic nationalism to populist nationalism. It identifies three interrelated dimensions of populist nationalism - leadership, new social polarisation, and the narratives of crisis and securitisation. This analytical framework is applied to discern how and why 'illiberal' peacebuilding emerged in post-war Sri Lanka. The article argues that populist nationalism and 'illiberal' peacebuilding have a symbiotic relationship. Populist nationalism provided political justifications to legitimise 'illiberal' peacebuilding, which, in return, empowered the war victors, disempowered conflict victims, and enabled populist-nationalist leaders to manipulate peacebuilding resources to consolidate power. Emerging as a leader-centric political discourse, populist nationalism is reinforced by new social polarisations and securitisation, which further deepens social conflicts.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available