3.8 Article

Municipal Solid Waste as Source of Renewable Energy in Brazil: Current Overview and Future Perspectives

Journal

REVISTA VIRTUAL DE QUIMICA
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 26-30

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
DOI: 10.21577/1984-6835.20210093

Keywords

Municipal solid waste; biomass; polymeric waste

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable energy source in Brazil has potential, but there is currently low interest due to lack of information. Research shows that at least 65% of MSW can be reused for energy, with significant economic and environmental potential, highlighting the need for more attention and research in this area.
With the increase in the Brazilian population and the demand for energy in large cities, the use of municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable energy source arises as a promising alternative. However, there is still low interest in its use due to the lack of information compiled about its potential. For this reason, this work aimed to present the current status of the MSW energy recovery in Brazil and to analyze the works published in this area in the last five years, in order to understand what their future perspectives are and to stimulate their use in the country. Through an updated bibliographic survey, it was observed that at least 65% of MSW have potential for energy reuse. The wet waste includes biomass (51.7%) and polymeric waste (13.5%). The analyzed studies revealed great concern with the management of MSW, mainly in the southeastern region of the country, and that the energy reuse of MSW through the techniques of incineration, biodigestion and gasification shows great economic and environmental potential. Despite the significant amount of available MSW, greater attention must be paid to this renewable energy source in order to make it a representative part in the Brazilian energy matrix.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available