3.9 Article

Mapping of Bead Geometry in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Systems Using Passive Vision

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROL AUTOMATION AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 1136-1147

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40313-021-00880-0

Keywords

Wire arc additive manufacturing; Passive vision; Bead geometry measurement; WAAM characteristic monitoring

Funding

  1. Shell Brasil Petroleo Ltda
  2. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa e InovacAo Industrial (Embrapii)
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Brasil (CAPES) [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a method for online extraction of geometry characteristics of deposited beads in WAAM using monocular cameras. The method involves measurement and feature extraction using various image processing algorithms, including segmentation and edge detection. Experimental results demonstrate the performance and effectiveness of the proposed method.
This work addresses the online extraction of the geometry characteristics (width and centerline) of deposited beads with monocular cameras for wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). To enable online measurement and feature extraction from captured images, an adaptive threshold is used for segmentation, a Canny algorithm for edge detection, a Hough-line transform for feature identification of the bead edges, and a filtering step to attenuate the low signal-to-noise ratios of deposition processes. Online measurements are performed in single-bead and layer (multi-bead) scenarios. The proposed vision-based solution is experimentally implemented in a WAAM robotic system composed of a welding torch, a Kuka KR90 robot arm, a power source, wire feeder, and a passive monocular camera. Experimental results illustrate the performance and effectiveness of the proposed visual-based methodology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available