Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Disentangling prevalence induced biases in medical image decision-making
Jennifer S. Trueblood et al.
COGNITION (2021)
Feedback moderates the effect of prevalence on perceptual decisions
Wanyi Lyu et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2021)
Serial dependence in the perceptual judgments of radiologists
Mauro Manassi et al.
COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS (2021)
Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback
Patrick H. Cox et al.
COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS (2021)
The prevalence effect in fingerprint identification: Match and non-match base-rates impact misses and false alarms
Bethany Growns et al.
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2021)
You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs
Dawn R. Weatherford et al.
COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS (2020)
Disambiguating serial effects of multiple timescales
Nikos Gekas et al.
JOURNAL OF VISION (2019)
Predicting Airport Screening Officers' Visual Search Competency With a Rapid Assessment
Stephen R. Mitroff et al.
HUMAN FACTORS (2018)
Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment
David E. Levari et al.
SCIENCE (2018)
The prevalence problem in the era of human papillomavirus screening
A. Evered
CYTOPATHOLOGY (2018)
The Persistent Low-Prevalence Effect in Unfamiliar Face-Matching: The Roles of Feedback and Criterion Shifting
Megan H. Papesh et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED (2018)
Prevalence in Visual Search: From the Clinic to the Lab and Back Again
Todd S. Horowitz
JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH (2017)
Outcomes Knowledge May Bias Radiological Decision-making
Stephen Littlefair et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2016)
Assessing the Impact of Prevalence Expectations on Radiologists' Behavior
Warren M. Reed et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2014)
Serial dependence in visual perception
Jason Fischer et al.
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE (2014)
Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: Trained observers miss rare targets, too
Jeremy M. Wolfe et al.
JOURNAL OF VISION (2013)
If You Don't Find It Often, You Often Don't Find It: Why Some Cancers Are Missed in Breast Cancer Screening
Karla K. Evans et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
Are Radiologists' Goals for Mammography Accuracy Consistent with Published Recommendations?
Sara L. Jackson et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2012)
False feedback increases detection of low-prevalence targets in visual search
Jeremy Schwark et al.
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS (2012)
Prevalence of Abnormalities Influences Cytologists' Error Rates in Screening for Cervical Cancer
Karla K. Evans et al.
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE (2011)
The Effect of Abnormality-Prevalence Expectation on Expert Observer Performance and Visual Search
Warren M. Reed et al.
RADIOLOGY (2011)
Varying Target Prevalence Reveals Two Dissociable Decision Criteria in Visual Search
Jeremy M. Wolfe et al.
CURRENT BIOLOGY (2010)
Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique: Evidence tor adaptive criterion learning
Sanghoon Han et al.
MEMORY & COGNITION (2008)
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks
Jeremy M. Wolfe et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2007)