Journal
SOCIAL IDENTITIES
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 252-266Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13504630.2021.2006623
Keywords
Political polarisation; polarised politics; political logics; polarised subjectivity
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article questions conceptualizations of political polarization, defining it as a tool of power. It identifies limitations in current concepts and proposes an alternative approach that focuses on power dynamics and three attributes of polarized politics. This new concept is able to reveal the dynamics and mechanisms of political polarization.
This article problematises conceptualisations of political polarisation and offers a new concept of it as a device of power. Thus defined, 'political polarisation' combines insights from governmentality studies and the concept of antagonism to identify what constitutes as polarised politics. First, the article shows two limitations of existing conceptualisations of polarisation: an overemphasis on partisan identity and the lack of considerations of dynamics of power in shaping politics. Then, it offers an alternative approach that pays due heed to these dynamics, by focusing on three attributes of polarised politics: the visible interactions between antagonistic discourses, the logic behind politics, and the formation of the polarised subject. By doing so, this new concept is able to reveal polarisation, including its dynamics and mechanism of reproduction.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available