Participatory budgeting for research funding decisions

This paper argues that funding decisions about scientific research should be made using participatory budgeting public engagement methods, to support publicly-funded research translation into evidence-based policymaking, given evident public support. This would reflect international shifts toward public participation in governance and respond to the need for changes in research funding policies, evidenced in studies showing how research funding allocations are inefficient or inequitable. Involving consumers in decision making is an established practice in health research, while experiments involving the public in prioritising between research proposals have promising results. Furthering such methods and moving towards participatory budgeting for research funding would further the shift towards participatory governance and public engagement with science. However, for participatory budgeting to support evidence-based policy by evidencing public support, who is participating is an important consideration. Upstream research does not yet have clear consumers for applying stakeholder participation methods established in health research. Moreover, civic engagement differs from consumer engagement in promoting democratic ideals. Legitimacy for public funding and policy decisions depends on a diversity of public participants in decision-making processes, reflecting broader society rather than a consumer group.

Automated summary

This paper argues that using participatory budgeting public engagement methods for funding decisions in scientific research can support evidence-based policymaking. This approach aligns with the growing international trend of public participation in governance and addresses the inefficiency and inequality in research funding allocations. Involving consumers in decision-making is common in health research, and experimenting with public participation in prioritizing research proposals shows promise. Implementing participatory budgeting for research funding can further promote participatory governance and public engagement with science. However, considering the participants' identities is crucial for this approach to demonstrate public support and inform evidence-based policy. Transforming stakeholder participation methods from health research to upstream research is challenging, and distinguishing civic engagement from consumer engagement is important for democratic ideals. To ensure legitimacy in public funding and policy decisions, a diverse range of participants reflecting broader society should be involved.