3.8 Article

The Relationship between Household SNAP Participation, Parent Feeding Styles, and Child Eating Behaviors

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19320248.2021.1994506

Keywords

SNAP; parental feeding; child eating behaviors; food insecurity; childhood obesity

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01HD068990]
  2. Childhood Obesity Prevention and Treatment Research (COPTR) Consortium from the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health [U01HL103622, U01HL103629, U01HL103620, U01HL103561]
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development, National Institutes of Health
  4. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that factors such as food insecurity may influence parental feeding styles and child eating behaviors, rather than SNAP participation. Screening by healthcare providers is recommended to address these issues.
This cross-sectional analysis of the Minnesota Now Everybody Together for Amazing Healthful Kids (NET-Works) study evaluated whether SNAP participation was associated with specific parental feeding styles and child eating behaviors. Associations between parent-reported feeding styles and child eating behaviors and SNAP participation were examined using multiple linear regression analyses and responses from 534 parent/child dyads (49.1% female children, 91.7% female parents). SNAP participation was not associated with specific feeding styles or child eating behaviors when adjusting for food insecurity, timing in SNAP cycle, and other covariates in this large, ethnically and racially diverse sample of predominantly mothers and preschool-aged children. Other factors, such as food insecurity, not SNAP participation, may influence parental feeding and child eating behaviors, and screening by health care providers is recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available