Development Studies in the World System of Global Knowledge Production: A Critical Empirical Analysis

In this article, I present the results of an analysis of the geopolitical diversity of 61,781 papers that have been published in 17 leading international journals in development studies, and the results of another analysis in which I analysed the career trajectories of 260 faculty members working at 10 highly valued development studies departments. Regarding geopolitical diversity, I found a systemic inequality in terms of both research output and education trajectories. I argue that these imbalances contradict the expressed goals and values of development studies as a discipline that aims to reduce geopolitical inequalities. Policy implications are also discussed, in which I propose to reconsider academic recruitment standards and to raise the visibility of different epistemologies of published research in development studies.

Automated summary

The study reveals systemic inequality in geopolitical diversity within the field of development studies, with disparities in research output and educational trajectories. The article advocates for a reconsideration of academic recruitment standards and increasing the visibility of diverse epistemologies in published research within development studies.