3.9 Article

A Multi-Site Analysis of the Prevalence of Food Insecurity in the United States, before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Journal

CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN NUTRITION
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzab135

Keywords

food security; COVID-19; survey sampling; food insecurity; high-risk

Funding

  1. COVID-19 seed grant from the College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University
  2. College of Health and Human Sciences, San Jose State University
  3. College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, DePaul University
  4. Connecticut: Stop Shop
  5. Hunger to Health Collaboratory (H2HC)
  6. University of Maine School of Food and Agriculture
  7. George J. Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions
  8. Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future
  9. Massachusetts: Stop Shop
  10. Wayne State University faculty startup funds
  11. College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University
  12. college's COVID-19 seed grant
  13. university's Investigator Research Funds
  14. University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Rapid COVID-19 seed grant
  15. University of Vermont
  16. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
  17. Agricultural Research Service Food Systems Research Center
  18. University of Colorado Natural Hazards Center, Quick Response Grant
  19. National Science Foundation [1635593]
  20. Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research
  21. UAlbany President's COVID-19 Minority Health Disparities Engaged Researchers Seed Funding Program
  22. Cornell Atkinson Center COVID-19 Rapid Response Fund award
  23. Utah Create Better Health Program
  24. Utah State University Extension
  25. Utah Department of Workforce Services
  26. University of Vermont College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
  27. University of Vermont Office of the Vice President of Research
  28. Gund Institute for Environment
  29. University of Vermont Agricultural Research Service Food Systems Research Center
  30. University of Washington Population Health Initiative (UWPHI)
  31. University of Washington School of Public Health (UWSPH)
  32. Department of Epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study shows a higher prevalence of food insecurity in the US since the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in surveys targeting high-risk populations. Certain demographic groups, such as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color, households with children, and those with job disruptions, are at higher risk of food insecurity. The variability in estimates is reported due to the differences in survey implementation methods.
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic profoundly affected food systems including food security. Understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted food security is important to provide support and identify long-term impacts and needs. Objective: The National Food Access and COVID research Team (NFACT) was formed to assess food security over different US study sites throughout the pandemic, using common instruments and measurements. This study presents results from 18 study sites across 15 states and nationally over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A validated survey instrument was developed and implemented in whole or part through an online survey of adults across the sites throughout the first year of the pandemic, representing 22 separate surveys. Sampling methods for each study site were convenience, representative, or high-risk targeted. Food security was measured using the USDA 6-item module. Food security prevalence was analyzed using ANOVA by sampling method to assess statistically significant differences. Results: Respondents (n = 27,168) indicate higher prevalence of food insecurity (low or very low food security) since the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with before the pandemic. In nearly all study sites, there is a higher prevalence of food insecurity among Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), households with children, and those with job disruptions. The findings demonstrate lingering food insecurity, with high prevalence over time in sites with repeat cross-sectional surveys. There are no statistically significant differences between convenience and representative surveys, but a statistically higher prevalence of food insecurity among high-risk compared with convenience surveys. Conclusions: This comprehensive study demonstrates a higher prevalence of food insecurity in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. These impacts were prevalent for certain demographic groups, and most pronounced for surveys targeting high-risk populations. Results especially document the continued high levels of food insecurity, as well as the variability in estimates due to the survey implementation method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available