Journal
AI & SOCIETY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-021-01331-9
Keywords
AI; Surveillance; Data security; Algorithm
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigates the public consumption of artificial intelligence from the perspective of data surveillance and security. The findings reveal that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness positively influence the acceptance of AI, while security and surveillance concerns have a negative impact on acceptance.
Public consumption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has been rarely investigated from the perspective of data surveillance and security. We show that the technology acceptance model, when properly modified with security and surveillance fears about AI, builds an insight on how individuals begin to use, accept, or evaluate AI and its automated decisions. We conducted two studies, and found positive roles of perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU). AI security concern, however, negatively affected PEOU and PU, resulting in less acceptance of AI-(1) use, (2) preference, and (3) participation. AI surveillance concern also had negative effects on the credibility of AI and its recommendations. We integrated extant literature on socio-demographic differences, providing an insight on how AI acceptance is based on one's rationality regarding (1) technological risks (security/surveillance) and (2) benefits (PEOU/PU) as well as other contextual factors of socio-demographics.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available