4.3 Article

Pursuing Paid Employment for Youth with Severe Disabilities: Multiple Perspectives on Pressing Challenges

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15407969221075629

Keywords

integrated employment; barriers; intellectual disability; autism; transition

Funding

  1. National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research-Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (RRTC) on Employment of Transition-Age Youth with Disabilities [HHS-2019-ACL-NIDILRR-RTEM-0339]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the various barriers that hinder young people with severe disabilities from participating in early work experiences. Interviews with 74 transition stakeholders reveal eight broad categories of challenges, including school, student, family, workplace, service system, partnership, transportation, and community. Different stakeholder groups have different concerns.
The road to employment begins in high school. However, few youth with severe disabilities currently participate in paid employment before graduation. The purpose of this study was to map the breadth of barriers that can hinder youth from accessing this influential transition experience. We held individual (n = 8) and focus group (n = 16) interviews with 74 transition stakeholders, including parents, educators, adult agency staff, school district leaders, and local employers. Collectively, they identified 47 barriers falling within eight broad categories of challenges: school, student, family, workplace, service system, partnership, transportation, and community. Although there were areas of clear consensus, noticeable differences were evident in the concerns raised by each of these five stakeholder groups. We present recommendations for research and practice aimed at connecting more youth with severe disabilities to early work experiences that can change their post-school employment trajectories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available