4.6 Article

Investigating environmental regulation effects on technological innovation: A meta-regression analysis

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 463-492

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0958305X211069654

Keywords

environmental regulation; technological innovation; meta-regression analysis; publication bias; Bayesian model average

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a meta-analysis of 1276 estimates from 49 studies to analyze the relationship between environmental regulation and innovative technologies. The results showed that controlling resources and ignoring endogeneity problems were significant factors in explaining the differences in study results. Additionally, factors such as middle year, publication year, usage of province-level data, linear model function, and the difference-in-differences model consistently explained the variations in reported estimates. The study found that environmental regulation had minimal influence on technical innovation, highlighting the need for multiple flexible policy instruments.
The relationship between environmental regulation (ER) and any associated innovative technologies has been studied in the previous decades; however, the estimated results have varied with no obvious consensus. To analyse what drives the different estimates in existing studies, we investigated the regulation-innovation relationship through a meta-analysis of 1276 estimates reported in 49 studies. In our analysis, 41 aspects of study design were controlled, Bayesian model averaging (BMA), and frequentist model averaging (FMA) methods were used to address model uncertainty problems. Our results suggested that controlling resources and ignoring endogeneity problems both played robust and methodical roles in explaining the differences in individual study results. Additionally, our results also indicated that five factors (middle year, publication year, usage of province-level data, linear model function, and the difference-in-differences (DID) model) consistently explained the differences in the reported estimates. We found that the ER had almost zero influence on technical innovation; more than one flexible policy instrument was required to trigger innovative activities among firms and sectors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available