4.2 Article

How diverse is child language acquisition research?

Journal

FIRST LANGUAGE
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 703-735

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/01427237211066405

Keywords

Linguistic diversity; child language acquisition; typology; archival research; language coverage

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Australian Research Council [CE140100041]
  3. Australian Research Council [CE140100041] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comprehensive theory of child language acquisition requires representative evidence from the world's diverse languages, but many languages are disappearing rapidly. The study analyzed 45 years of research from four major journals in child language acquisition, and found that only around 1.5% of the world's languages were represented. The majority of articles focused on English and other well-studied Indo-European languages, with limited research on non-Indo-European languages. The research was predominantly conducted in the Global North, and more efforts are needed to include languages from other regions.
A comprehensive theory of child language acquisition requires an evidential base that is representative of the typological diversity present in the world's 7000 or so languages. However, languages are dying at an alarming rate, and the next 50 years represents the last chance we have to document acquisition in many of them. Here, we take stock of the last 45 years of research published in the four main child language acquisition journals: Journal of Child Language, First Language, Language Acquisition and Language Learning and Development. We coded each article for several variables, including (1) participant group (mono vs multilingual), (2) language(s), (3) topic(s) and (4) country of author affiliation, from each journal's inception until the end of 2020. We found that we have at least one article published on around 103 languages, representing approximately 1.5% of the world's languages. The distribution of articles was highly skewed towards English and other well-studied Indo-European languages, with the majority of non-Indo-European languages having just one paper. A majority of the papers focused on studies of monolingual children, although papers did not always explicitly report participant group status. The distribution of topics across language categories was more even. The number of articles published on non-Indo-European languages from countries outside of North America and Europe is increasing; however, this increase is driven by research conducted in relatively wealthy countries. Overall, the vast majority of the research was produced in the Global North. We conclude that, despite a proud history of crosslinguistic research, the goals of the discipline need to be recalibrated before we can lay claim to truly a representative account of child language acquisition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available