3.9 Article

The influence of gap losses on the optical, energy, and exergy efficiencies of the all-glassed evacuated tube compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) solar collectors

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
Volume 41, Issue 8, Pages 962-979

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786451.2021.2016762

Keywords

Compound parabolic collector; solar radiation; optical analysis; thermodynamic analysis; evacuated tube; solar ray tracing method

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the optical and thermodynamic characteristics of solar CPC using accurate solar ray-tracing analysis and compared the efficiencies of CPC with different geometric concentration ratios. Results showed that CPC has higher absorption efficiency compared to other solar collectors, with efficiency increasing with the concentration ratio (C-t).
The compound parabolic concentrators (CPCs) are of importance due to their capability in absorbing the incident solar radiation in a wide limit. The present paper deals with the optical and thermodynamic analysis of a solar CPC applying the accurate solar ray-tracing analysis. To this end, the optical efficiency of the CPC was obtained for different geometric concentration ratios (C-t) based on the CPC modified equations and considering the diffuse radiation effects. The results demonstrated that the highest solar radiation absorption is obtained for C-t of 1.63. The outlet temperature (T-o), energy and exergy efficiencies (eta(I) and eta(II)) of the stationary evacuated tube CPC were compared with those of two different evacuated tube solar collectors without a concentrator (with large or low distance between the tubes). Based on the results, the average incident solar radiation of the CPC collector is higher than that of two other solar collectors without a concentrator. Besides, eta(I) of the CPC is higher than that of other collectors within the range of effective reflective angle of the CPC, while for the higher incident angles, eta(I) is lower than or equal to the other two collectors without a concentrator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available